Reflection and Refraction Experiment

INTRODUCTION:The purpose of this experiment was to test the validity of the right of reproach and Snell?s police (Also known as the practice of law of Refraction). aspect is defined as the reversal in electric broadcast of a particle stream or wave upon encountering a landmark. The honor of facial expression states that the angle of reflection and angle of incidence be equal, with each angle being measured from the prescript to the boundary:Refraction is defined as the bending of softly that takes baffle at a boundary amid two materials having antonymous indices of refraction due to a change in the give way of light as it passes from one medium to another. The Law of masticate (Snell?s Law) states that the dimension of the sines of the angles of incidence and refraction is equivalent to the counterpoise of velocities in the two media, or equivalent to the opposite balance of the indices of refraction: During the course of analyzing our data, we calculated t he index of refraction for the charge card lens and thereby the speed of light in the plastic.

The judge results that would need to occur to prove the validity of the Law of reflectiveness would be that when we conduct the experiment, the measure of the angle of incidence would take to be equal to the measurement of the angle of reflection, because this is what the Law of reflection states. The expected results that would need to occur to prove the validity of Snell?s Law would be that as light passes the border amid media, depending upon the relative refractive indices of the two media, the light will two be r efracted to a lesser angle, or a gigantic ! one. PROCEDURE:The materials that were needed for this experiment were: a table, a pencil, committal to writing for notes, a laser, a platform, and... If you want to get a outsize essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay